Point scores
Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Joondalup Lakers | 18 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 64 | 14 | 50 | 44 | 81% |
2. Reds 9 | 18 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 43 | 9 | 34 | 43 | 80% |
3. Hale 4 | 18 | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 47 | 16 | 31 | 39 | 72% |
4. Fremantle Cockburn 3 | 18 | 12 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 38 | 16 | 22 | 37 | 69% |
5. Melville 5 | 18 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 36 | 33 | 3 | 27 | 50% |
6. WASPS 4 | 18 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 35 | 37 | -2 | 24 | 44% |
7. Lions 4 | 18 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 14 | 29 | -15 | 18 | 33% |
8. Uni Associates 3 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 19 | 49 | -30 | 14 | 26% |
9. UWA 6 | 18 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 10 | 44 | -34 | 7 | 13% |
10. Mods-OGM 3 | 18 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 66 | -59 | 4 | 7% |
The point score is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
point scores. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.